According to the terms of the EU-US Bilateral Agreement (BASA) (see here), you can only import an engine with the status «rebuilt» in Block 11 if it has been released by the original engine manufacturer on a Form 8130-3 using units 13a to 13e. (left). «I am convinced that with this bilateral agreement, relations between Europe and China in the field of aviation will take the next step. This reinforces EASA`s commitment to working closely with international partners to build a safe and environmentally sustainable industry. Patrick Ky, Executive Director of EASA AMC M.A.501 (a) 5(a) /AMC 145.A.42 (a)1a) refers to a declassification document signed by an organization in accordance with the terms of an existing bilateral agreement signed by the European Community, was exposed. Such agreements are being signed: in accordance with the terms of the bilateral agreement BETWEEN the EU and the US (see here) a double authorisation is required for the purchase of used engines/components by a repair station established in the USA. Unlike THEA and Transport Canada, the PRC has not announced a timetable for testing the Boeing 737 Max8. They can now take the time to restore the rights of this aircraft, because with their EASA certification agreement, the C919 certification can come from the credible European «Good Housekeeping Seal of Approval». They no longer depend on the FAA. While this agreement covers a wide range of aviation-related aspects, including licensing and training of air transport personnel and services, we should focus on the mutual recognition of quotas and the `free movement of civil air products`. On 1st The bilateral agreement on aviation safety between the EU and China entered into force on 27 September. The agreement was first signed in Brussels on 20 May 2019.

This bilateral agreement, which mainly concerns the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) and the Civil Aviation Administration of China (CAAC), «will simplify the process of obtaining product authorizations. at the same time, we will ensure that high safety and environmental standards continue to be met. » What will be the real impact of this agreement on the aviation industry? Do you think that this bilateral agreement benefits one party more than the other? Does anyone have a gross market? Let us know your thoughts in the comments. The new agreement between CAAC and EASA has probably not yet revealed that the certification of PRC aircraft is sufficient to meet global standards. However, this link offers the potential participant some leverage in the aerospace market. If THEA finds a Chinese commercial aircraft that meets its standards, this «certificate» has great credibility with buyers. In addition to airworthiness certification, BASAs, moUs and WAs provide for bilateral cooperation in other aviation sectors, including maintenance, flight operations and environmental certification. During the meeting, EASA and CAAC adopted the Technical Implementation Procedures (TIP) that will support the agreement, including with regard to airworthiness. Those administrative and technical procedures shall describe how the two civil aviation regulators will carry out the validation and mutual recognition of product approvals for civil aviation. Bilateral agreements and arrangements allow for joint airworthiness certification of civil air products between two countries. The consolidated version of the «AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES AND THE EU ON COOPERATION IN THE REGULATION OF CIVIL AVIATION SECURITY» (EASA) was developed by EASA in order to make available to stakeholders an up-to-date and easily readable publication. .

. .